Risk Warning: CFDs and spread bets are complex instruments and come with a high risk of losing money rapidly due to leverage.
Approximately 80% of retail client accounts lose money when trading in CFDs and spread bets.
You should consider whether you understand how CFDs and spread bets work and whether you can afford to take the high risk of losing your money.

Lebanon Ceasefire Extended, Strait Mines, and Earnings

Lunaro Trading Team
27/04/2026 | Desk Notes

24 April 2026

Trump’s announcement that the Israel-Lebanon ceasefire has been extended by three weeks is Thursday’s headline diplomatic development. It arrives alongside a materially different posture on Iran: the President has ordered the Navy to engage any boats laying mines in the Strait of Hormuz and to intensify minesweeping operations, whilst simultaneously stating there is no urgency on an Iranian deal. The Strait remains effectively shut to commercial traffic. The diplomatic picture is therefore bifurcated. One track is moving toward de-escalation in Lebanon; the other is escalating operationally in the Strait without any timeline pressure attached to its resolution.

Markets are processing the two signals with a modest net positive. US futures are bid, with the Nasdaq leading at plus 0.69% against the S&P 500’s 0.29% gain and the Dow fractionally in the red. European indices are mixed to marginally positive. Foreign exchange moves are restrained across the board, consistent with a session that is digesting rather than decisively repricing. The technology-led bid in US futures follows the pattern established throughout this conflict period: any reduction in the most severe geopolitical tail risks, or any improvement in rate expectations, produces a disproportionate response in growth and technology names relative to the broader index.

Procter and Gamble and HCA Healthcare both report before the open, providing the morning’s earnings read on consumer staples and healthcare respectively. Economic data is light on the calendar, leaving the earnings prints and any further diplomatic or military developments as the session’s primary drivers.

The Diplomatic Split: Lebanon Progress, Iran Pressure

Geopolitical and conflict developments sourced from Investing.com.

The three-week extension of the Israel-Lebanon ceasefire is the most constructive diplomatic signal of the week. It extends a framework that has been holding on a separate track from the Iran confrontation and provides a degree of regional de-escalation that partially offsets the deterioration in the Hormuz picture. The Lebanon track and the Iran track are not directly linked in their negotiating mechanics, but they share the same broader regional risk environment, and progress on one contributes to the overall perception of whether the conflict’s geographic scope is expanding or contracting.

The Iran-related announcements from Trump are the more complex set of signals to interpret. Ordering the Navy to engage boats laying mines in the Strait and to intensify minesweeping is an operational escalation. It responds directly to the IRGC’s overnight vessel seizures reported on Thursday and represents a shift from blockade enforcement to active counter-mining operations. The practical implication is that the Strait’s closure is now being contested militarily as well as enforced diplomatically. The minesweeping mandate suggests the administration’s operational objective is to reopen the Strait to commercial traffic by clearing the physical obstruction, rather than waiting for a negotiated settlement to achieve that outcome.

The simultaneous statement that there is no urgency on an Iranian deal frames the military action as pressure rather than a precursor to talks. The administration is not using the operational escalation as a lever to bring Tehran back to the table; it is prosecuting the operational objective independently of the diplomatic track. For markets, the relevant question is whether successful minesweeping operations could reopen the Strait to commercial traffic ahead of a formal diplomatic settlement. If the answer is yes, then the oil price and inflation transmission channel that has defined the conflict period could begin to unwind before a ceasefire is in place. That would be a materially positive development, and it is the scenario that the Nasdaq’s outperformance this morning may be beginning to partially price.

US Futures and European Equities: A Technology-Led Bid

US futures and European index data sourced from Investing.com.

The divergence between the Nasdaq’s 0.69% gain and the S&P 500’s 0.29% advance is the morning’s primary technical signal. The Dow’s fractional decline of 0.03% completes a picture in which the session’s positive sentiment is concentrated in technology and growth names rather than distributed evenly across the market. That pattern is analytically consistent with a session where the primary positive catalyst, the Lebanon ceasefire extension and the minesweeping mandate’s implicit Strait reopening signal, is most directly relevant to rate expectations and inflation trajectory rather than to earnings or economic activity in the near term.

The Nasdaq 100 June 2026 contract is pressing into the upper end of the recent consolidation range, with all-time high resistance sitting just above. The technical significance of that resistance level in the context of this session is considerable. A decisive break above it would signal that the market has moved beyond the conflict-period consolidation range and is pricing a resolution trajectory rather than a prolonged stalemate. The Lebanon extension and the minesweeping news are together the type of cumulative positive signal that could provide the catalyst for such a move, though the Strait remaining shut and the Iran diplomatic track remaining explicitly without urgency are the qualifications that make a sustained break above resistance conditional rather than certain.

The S&P 500 June 2026 contract is holding within the upper part of the consolidation range, with the range floor the nearest support reference below. The index’s more modest gain relative to the Nasdaq reflects the broader composition of the S&P 500, which includes the energy sector names that have been performing in the opposite direction to the growth technology names throughout the conflict period. Energy sector strength on elevated oil prices and technology sector strength on rate relief are partially offsetting each other within the S&P 500’s headline number, which is why the more growth-concentrated Nasdaq shows the session’s positive sentiment more cleanly.

 

European indices are mixed to marginally positive: the FTSE 100 is up 0.03%, Germany 40 up 0.28%, Euro Stoxx 50 up 0.35%, and the France 40 down 0.26%. The France 40’s modest underperformance against its European peers is the outlier within an otherwise uniformly flat to slightly positive European picture. Foreign exchange moves are restrained across the board, with EURUSD up 0.09%, GBPUSD up 0.08%, and USDJPY up 0.03%. The muted FX response is consistent with a session that has received positive diplomatic news but is appropriately cautious about treating the Lebanon extension and the minesweeping order as a definitive resolution of the broader conflict’s market risks.

Procter and Gamble and HCA Healthcare: Morning Earnings

Earnings consensus data sourced from Investing.com.

Procter and Gamble reports before the open with consensus EPS of $1.56 on revenue of $20.53 billion, representing year-on-year revenue growth of 3.81% and EPS growth of 1.30%. The headline growth rates are modest, and the more analytically significant elements of the results will be volume trends, gross margin direction, and management commentary on cost pressures from the conflict. Procter and Gamble’s input cost exposure spans commodities including energy-intensive petrochemical derivatives, packaging materials, and transportation costs, all of which have been elevated by the conflict’s supply-side disruption. Whether the company has been able to pass those costs through to consumers via pricing, absorb them via efficiency measures, or has seen volume softness as a result of price increases is the earnings narrative that extends beyond the quarterly numbers to the broader consumer staples sector read-through.

Volume trends are the specific metric to watch within the results. A company reporting revenue growth of 3.81% on EPS growth of 1.30% is a company where the gap between the two metrics needs explanation. If volumes are declining as pricing holds, that is a different competitive and consumer environment signal than if volumes are growing alongside price. The conflict period has created a consumer cost environment in which discretionary spending has been under pressure from elevated energy costs, and the question for staples companies is whether the essential nature of their products has insulated their volumes or whether even staples consumers are trading down in response to the broader cost environment.

HCA Healthcare reports with consensus EPS of $7.16 on revenue of $19.07 billion, representing year-on-year revenue growth of 4.11% and EPS growth of 11.01%. The company has delivered three consecutive earnings beats, which sets a moderately elevated bar for the current results. The key focus areas are reimbursement trends, labour cost trajectory, and forward guidance. Healthcare labour costs have been a persistent pressure point across the sector, and the extent to which HCA has managed that pressure relative to reimbursement rate evolution will determine whether the 11.01% consensus EPS growth is exceeded or merely met. Forward guidance is the most market-sensitive element of the print, particularly given that the conflict’s macroeconomic effects on consumer healthcare utilisation patterns are still evolving.

The Bottom Line

Thursday’s session is defined by a diplomatic split that markets are processing as a modest net positive. The Lebanon ceasefire extension is constructive and reduces the conflict’s regional escalation risk on one front. The Navy minesweeping mandate is an operational escalation on the Iran front that carries the implicit possibility of a Strait reopening ahead of a formal diplomatic settlement, which is the development the Nasdaq’s outperformance is beginning to partially price. Trump’s explicit statement that there is no urgency on an Iranian deal is the qualification that prevents the morning from being a decisively positive session.

The Nasdaq is pressing into upper consolidation range resistance, with all-time highs just above. The S&P 500 is holding in the upper part of its range. European indices are mixed to flat. FX moves are restrained. Procter and Gamble and HCA Healthcare provide the morning’s earnings read on consumer staples and healthcare, with volume trends and margin direction the primary focus for the former and reimbursement and labour cost trends for the latter.

The Strait’s operational status, as minesweeping operations intensify, is the variable to watch. A credible reopening signal from the Strait would be the catalyst that takes the Nasdaq through the resistance level it is currently testing.

The content of this article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial advice. Market data sourced from Investing.com. Past performance is not indicative of future results.

Lunaro is an execution-only service provider. This material is a marketing communication and is provided for general information and educational purposes only. It does not take into account your personal circumstances, objectives or needs. Any opinions are those of the author at the time of writing and may change without notice. Nothing in this material constitutes (or should be construed as) financial, investment, legal, regulatory or tax advice, or a recommendation to engage in any investment activity. You should not rely on this material when making investment or trading decisions.

This material has not been prepared in accordance with legal requirements designed to promote the independence of investment research and is not subject to any prohibition on dealing ahead of the dissemination of investment research. Lunaro may deal as principal and/or have an interest in the financial instruments or markets referred to in this material in the ordinary course of its business, including at or around the time of publication, and does not seek to take advantage of this material prior to its dissemination.

While reasonable care has been taken in preparing this material, no representation or warranty is made as to its accuracy or completeness and Lunaro accepts no liability for any loss arising from any use of, or reliance on, this material. Past performance is not indicative of future results.

CFDs are complex instruments and come with a high risk of losing money rapidly due to leverage. Approximately 80% of retail client accounts lose money when trading in CFDs. You should consider whether you understand how CFDs work and whether you can afford to take the high risk of losing your money.

Lunaro Financial Services Limited is authorised and regulated by the Financial Conduct Authority (FCA), Register No. 184333. Registered in England and Wales, No. 03148972.
Lunaro Markets Limited is authorised and regulated by the Financial Services Regulatory Authority (FSRA) of Abu Dhabi Global Market (ADGM), Financial Services Permission No. 200034, Registration No. 000005466.